Update from Bernama.com
January 30, 2004 17:35 PM
KOTA KINABALU, Jan 30 (Bernama) -- Two General Operations Force (GOF) personnel charged with raping a 13-year-old girl at a temporary immigration detention centre in Menggatal near here two years ago were acquitted and discharged by the Sessions Court here Friday without their defence being called.
In acquitting them, judge Datuk Nurchaya Arshad said she found that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against the two men, Mohamed Fauzee Yahya, 34, and Ahmad Nazri Zainurrdin, 33, both of Perak.
Mohamed Fauzee was charged with raping the girl at Block G of the centre between July 27 and Aug 12 2002 while Ahmad Nazri was charged with committing the offence at the same venue between July 27 and Aug 16 2002.
Nurchaya said the prosecution failed to establish that the alleged incident had indeed taken place with or without the consent of the victim.
"There were no signs that the victim had put up a struggle during the alleged incident as prosecution witness Dr Soon Ruey did not find any external injuries to the victim's private parts and no examination was conducted to find any injuries to the accused persons.
"There was no evidence introduced by the prosecution that the victim had shown signs or behaviour immediately after the alleged incident which was consistent with her being forced against her will," she said.
Nurchaya said there was also a long delay between the time of the alleged incident and the time of the victim's complaint which was made for the first time in the Philippines where she was mistakenly deported along with other Filipinos.
"The victim has alleged that the incident took place in full view of the other guards as the room door was left open.
"The prosecution has however chosen not to call any of the other guards to corroborate this story and I am in a real state of doubt as to whether the incident has occurred as alleged," she said.
Nurchaya also said that she had doubt concerning the issue of the victim suffering from gonorrhoea and whether the prosecution had proven that the GOF men had sexual intercourse with her when there was no evidence that they had contracted the disease. On the issue of identification of the GOF men, Nurchaya said there was a doubt from the testimony of two investigating officers as to whether the girl did in fact gave a description of the men before their photographs were shown to her.
"Even if the identification parade (IP) was conducted in a fair and proper manner, its evidential value was weakened from the fact that the victim was shown the photographs of the accused persons while she was in the Philippines and again before the second IP was conducted," she said.
The prosecution had also failed to establish that the girl was under 16 years' old during the alleged incident.
Although documents were tendered to prove she was under 16, her father as well as investigating officers had created doubts when they were unable to rule out the possibility that it might belong or refer to some person other than the girl, said Nurchaya.
-- BERNAMA
Saturday, January 31, 2004
Thursday, January 29, 2004
Tham to try for MP seat this time
Daily Express
29 January, 2004
Kota Kinabalu: Deputy Chief Minister-cum-Resource Development and Information Technology Minister, Datuk Nyip Shen will not be contesting the Elopura constituency in the coming election.
Tham, who is Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) Deputy President, said he is prepared to play a new role as Member of Parliament. It would also be unfair to Elopura voters to keep on voting for the same person when his successor might have new ideas to develop the constituency, he said.
Batu Sapi is the latest Sandakan parliamentary constituency under the Election Commission’s new electoral boundaries. Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) holds the Sandakan parliamentary seat, while Umno is in control of the Kinabatangan, Libaran and Beluran seats.
Speaking when hosting his Ministry’s Chinese New Year luncheon for the local media at Pacific Sutera, here, Wednesday, he said:
“I am not running away from Elopura but considering taking up a new role as a Member of Parliament.” SAPP President Datuk Yong Teck Lee had, in principle, accepted his decision.
He said the time has come for leaders from the younger generation, who are ready for the task, to be brought forward for the job and indicated that the party might have earmarked a successor for the Elopura seat.
“The decision to allow my successor to contest the next election was not made overnight. It has been at the back of my mind for several years already.”
Tham, 45, said it took him 15 years to groom his choice of successor, but declined to reveal his identity except that he “is a young person”.
Tham had served as Elopura Assemblyman for 19 years, since winning it under PBS in 1985. Tham holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the UK, majoring in electronic and electrical engineering. At 27, he became the youngest Minister when appointed Tourism and Environment Development Minister.
Together with Yong, they left PBS on the eve of the 1994 State election to form SAPP, which succeeded in withdrawing some Chinese support for PBS and went on to win the Elopura, Tanjong Papat and Likas State seats and the Gaya parliamentary seat, alongside the Barisan Nasional.
The crucial break from PBS resulted from dissatisfaction over the way Chinese leaders were treated by some factions in PBS and unwarranted meddling in the choice of Chinese candidates by the then PBS “kitchen cabinet”.
Meanwhile, Tham commended the media for having played a befitting role as disseminator of information to the people at large.
According to him, the media had complemented tremendously to the Government’s development efforts.
He said the future might see the local media being more independent and professional in the duties entrusted to them.
29 January, 2004
Kota Kinabalu: Deputy Chief Minister-cum-Resource Development and Information Technology Minister, Datuk Nyip Shen will not be contesting the Elopura constituency in the coming election.
Tham, who is Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) Deputy President, said he is prepared to play a new role as Member of Parliament. It would also be unfair to Elopura voters to keep on voting for the same person when his successor might have new ideas to develop the constituency, he said.
Batu Sapi is the latest Sandakan parliamentary constituency under the Election Commission’s new electoral boundaries. Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) holds the Sandakan parliamentary seat, while Umno is in control of the Kinabatangan, Libaran and Beluran seats.
Speaking when hosting his Ministry’s Chinese New Year luncheon for the local media at Pacific Sutera, here, Wednesday, he said:
“I am not running away from Elopura but considering taking up a new role as a Member of Parliament.” SAPP President Datuk Yong Teck Lee had, in principle, accepted his decision.
He said the time has come for leaders from the younger generation, who are ready for the task, to be brought forward for the job and indicated that the party might have earmarked a successor for the Elopura seat.
“The decision to allow my successor to contest the next election was not made overnight. It has been at the back of my mind for several years already.”
Tham, 45, said it took him 15 years to groom his choice of successor, but declined to reveal his identity except that he “is a young person”.
Tham had served as Elopura Assemblyman for 19 years, since winning it under PBS in 1985. Tham holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the UK, majoring in electronic and electrical engineering. At 27, he became the youngest Minister when appointed Tourism and Environment Development Minister.
Together with Yong, they left PBS on the eve of the 1994 State election to form SAPP, which succeeded in withdrawing some Chinese support for PBS and went on to win the Elopura, Tanjong Papat and Likas State seats and the Gaya parliamentary seat, alongside the Barisan Nasional.
The crucial break from PBS resulted from dissatisfaction over the way Chinese leaders were treated by some factions in PBS and unwarranted meddling in the choice of Chinese candidates by the then PBS “kitchen cabinet”.
Meanwhile, Tham commended the media for having played a befitting role as disseminator of information to the people at large.
According to him, the media had complemented tremendously to the Government’s development efforts.
He said the future might see the local media being more independent and professional in the duties entrusted to them.
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
Are Malaysian Journalists Too Professional?
Another tragedy helped to open our eyes, or rather helps to remind us. The Star, theSun (using SinChew's pix), Utusan Malaysia, SinChew, China Press and Nanyang ran pictures of an Iranian man man in flames on their frontpage. The burning pain was most vividly captured in Utusan (image-linked above), SinChew and China Press.
The man then died in hospital few hours later. We felt sorry for the man and angry with those who might caused his death. No one realises how the pictures came about.
The big question is, are our journalists and cameramen over professional that they chose to capture the event more instead of offering help in time of emergency? Is work really more important and precious than life? Or was that true prefessionalism, true journalism?
Most of the time we found journalists who were too engrossed in their work that they offended and humiliated others with they controversial questions, which are normally traps, and they way the questions were posted. Either it was done intentionally or otherwise, they might have assumed that being a reporter they have full access to everywhere.
It is common for cameramen to block the view of the audience while trying to capture their best shot, sometimes step on the toes of the invited guests, brushed against elders and knocked down children. Their moving around during speeches is really irritating.
Some young journalists, or rather forgetful reporters, pushed their recorders right to the face of the person being interviewed. Many a time we couldn't even see the face. It was really a sign of disrespect, as if the person was talking to recorders and microphones.
Some cameramen even climbed on stage to take a close-up shot of the speakers. They, who are supposed to be on the front line of everything could not even use current technology which uses zoom lenses. Worst still, not many of them are properly dressed for the occasion. Some came in slippers, dirty T-shirts and faded jeans. It was a total contrast of the function they were covering. It was not only disrespect but also an eye sore.
When go through the reports on papers the following day we find them missing on the main point. Some events which they were supposed to cover were not even mentioned. Focus were put on controversial matters or from the prepared text of the speakers.
Do we call this true journalism? Are journalists or cameramen still human being? Do they practice what they wrote?
See for yourself, if your are insulted, you are probably one of those who have offended many but no one dare to touch you because you might later get even with your scandalous reports.
The man then died in hospital few hours later. We felt sorry for the man and angry with those who might caused his death. No one realises how the pictures came about.
The big question is, are our journalists and cameramen over professional that they chose to capture the event more instead of offering help in time of emergency? Is work really more important and precious than life? Or was that true prefessionalism, true journalism?
Most of the time we found journalists who were too engrossed in their work that they offended and humiliated others with they controversial questions, which are normally traps, and they way the questions were posted. Either it was done intentionally or otherwise, they might have assumed that being a reporter they have full access to everywhere.
It is common for cameramen to block the view of the audience while trying to capture their best shot, sometimes step on the toes of the invited guests, brushed against elders and knocked down children. Their moving around during speeches is really irritating.
Some young journalists, or rather forgetful reporters, pushed their recorders right to the face of the person being interviewed. Many a time we couldn't even see the face. It was really a sign of disrespect, as if the person was talking to recorders and microphones.
Some cameramen even climbed on stage to take a close-up shot of the speakers. They, who are supposed to be on the front line of everything could not even use current technology which uses zoom lenses. Worst still, not many of them are properly dressed for the occasion. Some came in slippers, dirty T-shirts and faded jeans. It was a total contrast of the function they were covering. It was not only disrespect but also an eye sore.
When go through the reports on papers the following day we find them missing on the main point. Some events which they were supposed to cover were not even mentioned. Focus were put on controversial matters or from the prepared text of the speakers.
Do we call this true journalism? Are journalists or cameramen still human being? Do they practice what they wrote?
See for yourself, if your are insulted, you are probably one of those who have offended many but no one dare to touch you because you might later get even with your scandalous reports.
Monday, January 26, 2004
Media Workshop To Revive Interest In BIMP-EAGA
Bernama.com
January 26, 2004 12:54 PM
KOTA KINABALU, Jan 26 (Bernama) -- The Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines-Facilitation Centre (BIMP-FC) will conduct a communication and media workshop in Manado, Sulawesi, this week as part of efforts to revive interest in the BIMP-EAGA (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines-East Asean Growth Area).
The BIMP-FC said in a statement issued here Monday that the two-day workshop which begins on Thursday is aimed at increasing the level of knowledge, awareness, appreciation and understanding of the BIMP-EAGA socio-economic development and imperatives for development.
"It is also to convince the media community to play an active role in creating a positive image for the BIMP-EAGA as well as to establish a network of committed and supportive communicators.
"The workshop will also access the current cooperation strategies in effective communications and with a view to identifying more appropriate communications and information dissemination mechanisms and activities," it said.
The workshop will be attended by media practitioners from participating regions.
The BIMP-FC was established in September last year following the 11th Senior Officials' Meeting and 8th Ministerial Meeting in Davao City.
The BIMP-FC is a concerted effort by the four-member countries to revive the BIMP-EAGA initiative. It is entrusted with the responsibility of accelerating regional cooperation by improving coordination of development activities and facilitating the implementation of priority projects and programmes.
The BIMP-EAGA, conceptualised in 1992 and launched in 1994, is aimed at increasing trade, investments and tourism in the sub-region.
"While implemented during a period of economic boom for the four participating countries, the 1997 Asian financial crisis seriously set back anticipated sub-regional developments as governments were forced to refocus their attention to the more pressing national economic and political issues," it said.
In the absence of strong public support, the capacity of the private sector to spur growth and economic activity within the sub-region has been greatly reduced.
"However, as the economic conditions began to improve, and with renewed confidence, the leaders of the four participating governments expressed commitment and support to the economic cooperation initiative," the BIMP-FC said.
January 26, 2004 12:54 PM
KOTA KINABALU, Jan 26 (Bernama) -- The Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines-Facilitation Centre (BIMP-FC) will conduct a communication and media workshop in Manado, Sulawesi, this week as part of efforts to revive interest in the BIMP-EAGA (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines-East Asean Growth Area).
The BIMP-FC said in a statement issued here Monday that the two-day workshop which begins on Thursday is aimed at increasing the level of knowledge, awareness, appreciation and understanding of the BIMP-EAGA socio-economic development and imperatives for development.
"It is also to convince the media community to play an active role in creating a positive image for the BIMP-EAGA as well as to establish a network of committed and supportive communicators.
"The workshop will also access the current cooperation strategies in effective communications and with a view to identifying more appropriate communications and information dissemination mechanisms and activities," it said.
The workshop will be attended by media practitioners from participating regions.
The BIMP-FC was established in September last year following the 11th Senior Officials' Meeting and 8th Ministerial Meeting in Davao City.
The BIMP-FC is a concerted effort by the four-member countries to revive the BIMP-EAGA initiative. It is entrusted with the responsibility of accelerating regional cooperation by improving coordination of development activities and facilitating the implementation of priority projects and programmes.
The BIMP-EAGA, conceptualised in 1992 and launched in 1994, is aimed at increasing trade, investments and tourism in the sub-region.
"While implemented during a period of economic boom for the four participating countries, the 1997 Asian financial crisis seriously set back anticipated sub-regional developments as governments were forced to refocus their attention to the more pressing national economic and political issues," it said.
In the absence of strong public support, the capacity of the private sector to spur growth and economic activity within the sub-region has been greatly reduced.
"However, as the economic conditions began to improve, and with renewed confidence, the leaders of the four participating governments expressed commitment and support to the economic cooperation initiative," the BIMP-FC said.
Safest To Live In Jail
The only need for security for men when they first existed was to protect them from the animals attack. For that they learned to tame some and living away from the wild animals. Simple life, simple security (if we do consider that as security).
When men became more and more civilised, the more security men needed. There are a lot more fear in men. Fear of personal safety, fear of losing personal properties, fear of being raped, fear of being embarrassed, and many more.
Instead of making more friends, men made more enemies due to competitions in studies, business, politics, social status, wealth, women and so on.
So man started to build taller houses in higher areas. They constructed higher walls and fences, grills, alarm system. Not enough with that they employ security guards and body guards to protect them 24 hours a day. They even buy insurance to safeguard in case of tragedy.
Don't you think the better the security system, the more similar it is to a jail?
Why not go to jail then? Tall walls, all grilled up, 24 hours security with experience and qualified policemen on guard?
Unless we make more friends and make peace, we are all going to jail, government jail or that of our own.
When men became more and more civilised, the more security men needed. There are a lot more fear in men. Fear of personal safety, fear of losing personal properties, fear of being raped, fear of being embarrassed, and many more.
Instead of making more friends, men made more enemies due to competitions in studies, business, politics, social status, wealth, women and so on.
So man started to build taller houses in higher areas. They constructed higher walls and fences, grills, alarm system. Not enough with that they employ security guards and body guards to protect them 24 hours a day. They even buy insurance to safeguard in case of tragedy.
Don't you think the better the security system, the more similar it is to a jail?
Why not go to jail then? Tall walls, all grilled up, 24 hours security with experience and qualified policemen on guard?
Unless we make more friends and make peace, we are all going to jail, government jail or that of our own.
Sunday, January 25, 2004
Shame On You, Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir
It is confirmed and proven that the Minister of Culture, Arts and Tourism, Datuk Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir did not do his homework when he came out with the idea of hosting the second national Kongsi Raya Open House in Johore Baru.
He was expecting 300,000 people from Malaysia and Singapore. New Straits Times later reported that the expectation was 350,000. Kadir, in his desperate effort to scout for attendance also threatened the Chinese community saying that it would be a shame if they cannot come out and support the event.
The final count was, only about 100,000 people tuned out. Blame it on the rain, or God?
Knowing very well that Johor was experiencing the rainny season where some areas were already flooded. If homework was done, a lot of things could have been avoided. If more careful preparation has been made, at least to choose a more suitable venue, turn out should be much better.
If Kadir has not been rude, arrogant and over confident, more people would have come out to support dispite the rain. The welcoming party given by the Chinese community to the Prime Minister, Pak Lah, was proof enough that the Chinese would brave the rain to be with the leader they respect.
He was expecting 300,000 people from Malaysia and Singapore. New Straits Times later reported that the expectation was 350,000. Kadir, in his desperate effort to scout for attendance also threatened the Chinese community saying that it would be a shame if they cannot come out and support the event.
The final count was, only about 100,000 people tuned out. Blame it on the rain, or God?
Knowing very well that Johor was experiencing the rainny season where some areas were already flooded. If homework was done, a lot of things could have been avoided. If more careful preparation has been made, at least to choose a more suitable venue, turn out should be much better.
If Kadir has not been rude, arrogant and over confident, more people would have come out to support dispite the rain. The welcoming party given by the Chinese community to the Prime Minister, Pak Lah, was proof enough that the Chinese would brave the rain to be with the leader they respect.
Saturday, January 24, 2004
Security Or Scare Crow?
It was reported by Bernama on 22 January 2004 that the Home Ministry would take stern action against Gemilang Sekuriti Sdn Bhd, the security guard company that employed a man detained in connection with the rape and murder of 10-year-old Nurul Huda Ghani last Saturday.
This includes either suspending or revoking the company's licence if investigations prove that it failed to adhere to the Private Agencies Act 1971.
The Ministry's Deputy Secretary-General (Security), Datuk Shafee Abu Bakar, said that under the Act all security guard companies were required to submit the names of those it wanted to employ as security personnel to the police. This was to enable the police to run a background check on the individuals to ensure that they had no criminal records.
"Their first offence was hiring an individual who was yet to pass police screening. In fact, I was informed that they never sent their employees' names to the police. In fact, the company's owner can be fined RM10,000 or be jailed for not more than two years," he said.
He said this when asked to comment on the rape and murder of Nurul Huda at a Tenaga Nasional Berhad sub-station guardhouse in Tanjung Kupang, Johor, involving a Gemilang Sekuriti guard.
Three men took turns to rape and sodomise the Sekolah Kebangsaan Tiram Duku pupil in the guardhouse, located 100 metres from her house.
Shafee said only 2,000 security guards out of 150,000 employed by 312 security guard companies had undergone the basic training course as required by the Ministry.
It is sad to note that the authorities have all the necessary statistics and figures, which also include reports and records, but only sit on them when they were supposed to work out solutions and preventions before anything happens. With 2,000 out of 150,000 security guards trained, which is less than 2%, the Home Ministry is clearly sleeping on their job all this time, not much different to those sleeping night guards.
There were also complaints that the police took more than two years to do the screening on names submitted by the security firms. The PM was saying the police has too many things to do and has to be extra careful. Was the delay due to red-tape, bureacracy or mere 'tidak apa'?
If there was no victim like Nurul Huda, there would not be anyone interested in the real picture of the private security. Security guards, to most of us, are just scare crows. They would not be able to do much. They sleep while they were supposed to be on duty. They even play insider for many break-ins to factories, offices and houses. They too are the first to run when robberies happen since the weapons supplied to them are far smaller. The Chief Inspector shot dead during a bank robbery was an exceptional case.
With so many security firms in the market (both legal and illegal), competition is too stiff causing them to hire cheap security who are there to 'scare', not to guard. Some firms even show letter of recommendation from the Home Ministry.
To the opportunists, Nurul Huda's case has provided politicians the opportunities to gain cheap publicities again. Look at some of the headlines:
Jojo Believed To Have Fled The District, Say Police
Cabinet To Discuss Rape Of Children - Najib
Home Ministry May Revoke Licence Of Gemilang Sekuriti
Government Psychiatrist Visits Nurul Huda's Family
TNB To Help Nurul Huda's Family
Security Guards Should Undergo Mental Evaluation - Chua
Nurul Huda Case: Police Investigations 90 Per Cent Completed
Induction Course To Verify Worker's Background
PM Extends Condolences To Family For Nurul Huda's Death
How much improvement would be made after this? Will these scare crows stay?
This includes either suspending or revoking the company's licence if investigations prove that it failed to adhere to the Private Agencies Act 1971.
The Ministry's Deputy Secretary-General (Security), Datuk Shafee Abu Bakar, said that under the Act all security guard companies were required to submit the names of those it wanted to employ as security personnel to the police. This was to enable the police to run a background check on the individuals to ensure that they had no criminal records.
"Their first offence was hiring an individual who was yet to pass police screening. In fact, I was informed that they never sent their employees' names to the police. In fact, the company's owner can be fined RM10,000 or be jailed for not more than two years," he said.
He said this when asked to comment on the rape and murder of Nurul Huda at a Tenaga Nasional Berhad sub-station guardhouse in Tanjung Kupang, Johor, involving a Gemilang Sekuriti guard.
Three men took turns to rape and sodomise the Sekolah Kebangsaan Tiram Duku pupil in the guardhouse, located 100 metres from her house.
Shafee said only 2,000 security guards out of 150,000 employed by 312 security guard companies had undergone the basic training course as required by the Ministry.
It is sad to note that the authorities have all the necessary statistics and figures, which also include reports and records, but only sit on them when they were supposed to work out solutions and preventions before anything happens. With 2,000 out of 150,000 security guards trained, which is less than 2%, the Home Ministry is clearly sleeping on their job all this time, not much different to those sleeping night guards.
There were also complaints that the police took more than two years to do the screening on names submitted by the security firms. The PM was saying the police has too many things to do and has to be extra careful. Was the delay due to red-tape, bureacracy or mere 'tidak apa'?
If there was no victim like Nurul Huda, there would not be anyone interested in the real picture of the private security. Security guards, to most of us, are just scare crows. They would not be able to do much. They sleep while they were supposed to be on duty. They even play insider for many break-ins to factories, offices and houses. They too are the first to run when robberies happen since the weapons supplied to them are far smaller. The Chief Inspector shot dead during a bank robbery was an exceptional case.
With so many security firms in the market (both legal and illegal), competition is too stiff causing them to hire cheap security who are there to 'scare', not to guard. Some firms even show letter of recommendation from the Home Ministry.
To the opportunists, Nurul Huda's case has provided politicians the opportunities to gain cheap publicities again. Look at some of the headlines:
Jojo Believed To Have Fled The District, Say Police
Cabinet To Discuss Rape Of Children - Najib
Home Ministry May Revoke Licence Of Gemilang Sekuriti
Government Psychiatrist Visits Nurul Huda's Family
TNB To Help Nurul Huda's Family
Security Guards Should Undergo Mental Evaluation - Chua
Nurul Huda Case: Police Investigations 90 Per Cent Completed
Induction Course To Verify Worker's Background
PM Extends Condolences To Family For Nurul Huda's Death
How much improvement would be made after this? Will these scare crows stay?
Friday, January 23, 2004
Watch MCA In Sabah
It was interesting to watch MCA Deputy President, Dato' Seri Chan Kong Choi attending the Chinese New Year open house hosted by MCA Sabah. Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Musa Aman was also seen present.
It is not difficult to guess to intention of Chan's presence in Sabah. MCA is hoping to fight for at least 3 seats in the coming state election. The three areas are in Kota Kinabalu, Sandakan and Tawau. MCA presently have two senators from Sabah, Datuk Agnes Shim and Datuk Edward Khoo.
MCA State Secretary Tan Kim Beng is lobbying very hard as a candidate. He is also the secretary for Chinese Chamber of Commerce. He has been going round meeting the people during Chinese New Year. He has openly declared his intention to stand for election. However his arrogant attitude has offended quite a number of people both inside and outside the party. He might just fail himself.
There are two personalities eyeing for Tawau area. They are former senator, Datuk Dr Charlie Chang and Datuk Thien Kok Poh. Charlie Chang has stood for election many times but failed every time. He was with BERJAYA before joining MCA. Due to his 'loyalty' he was made senator for one term.
However, intense party politicking splitted Tawau MCA into two factions. Charlie represents the older generation while Thien considered himself as new blood. Charlie Chang has been busy with his various government projects and was away from Tawau for quite sometimes.
Thien meanwhile was regarded by the socieity as the trouble maker. He bought himself into Tawau Hakka Association for a term and was booted out. He then pushed him way into Tawau Chinese Chamber of Commberce aiming for the presidency. His team lost, but was later made the deputy president after the President Datuk Kho Chung Seng retired. He also negotiated his way into MCA by becoming the Semporna Division Chairman and Youth Leader.
Thien's colourful background, an Indonesian, illegal logging, womaniser and questionable datukship have made him not possible to achieve his political dreams.
Interestingly, Chinese based parties in Sabah are more inclined toward tinted personalities as their candidates. As if good man are all taken.
Do we still have better choice?
It is not difficult to guess to intention of Chan's presence in Sabah. MCA is hoping to fight for at least 3 seats in the coming state election. The three areas are in Kota Kinabalu, Sandakan and Tawau. MCA presently have two senators from Sabah, Datuk Agnes Shim and Datuk Edward Khoo.
MCA State Secretary Tan Kim Beng is lobbying very hard as a candidate. He is also the secretary for Chinese Chamber of Commerce. He has been going round meeting the people during Chinese New Year. He has openly declared his intention to stand for election. However his arrogant attitude has offended quite a number of people both inside and outside the party. He might just fail himself.
There are two personalities eyeing for Tawau area. They are former senator, Datuk Dr Charlie Chang and Datuk Thien Kok Poh. Charlie Chang has stood for election many times but failed every time. He was with BERJAYA before joining MCA. Due to his 'loyalty' he was made senator for one term.
However, intense party politicking splitted Tawau MCA into two factions. Charlie represents the older generation while Thien considered himself as new blood. Charlie Chang has been busy with his various government projects and was away from Tawau for quite sometimes.
Thien meanwhile was regarded by the socieity as the trouble maker. He bought himself into Tawau Hakka Association for a term and was booted out. He then pushed him way into Tawau Chinese Chamber of Commberce aiming for the presidency. His team lost, but was later made the deputy president after the President Datuk Kho Chung Seng retired. He also negotiated his way into MCA by becoming the Semporna Division Chairman and Youth Leader.
Thien's colourful background, an Indonesian, illegal logging, womaniser and questionable datukship have made him not possible to achieve his political dreams.
Interestingly, Chinese based parties in Sabah are more inclined toward tinted personalities as their candidates. As if good man are all taken.
Do we still have better choice?
Sunday, January 18, 2004
Malulah Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fazdir
In the quest for another BIGGEST, this time a Kongsi Raya Chinese New Year open house in Johore Baru, 300,000 are expected to attend from both Malaysia and Singapore.
Among those expected to attend are Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Jamalullail, and Raja Permaisuri Agong, Tuanku Fauziah Tengku Abdul Rashid; Sultan Johor, Sultan Iskandar dan Sultanah Johor, Sultanah Zanariah; Tengku Mahkota Johor, Tengku Ibrahim Ismail and Raja Zarith Sofia.
Also expected are Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi; Prime Minister of Singapore, Goh Chok Thong and his deputy, Lee Hsein Loong. Their cabinet ministers are expected to attend the function as well.
In his eagerness to invite the public to attend the function, Minister of Culture, Arts & Tourism, Datuk Paduka Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir said, "I know the Chinese does not normally go out on the third day of Chinese New Year, tapi malulah kalau orang Cina tidak datang". He was caught saying that on TV3.
One just could not understand why he has to put it in such a way to invite the public, especial the Chinese, to attend the open house. Why not make a proper, polite and sincere invitation. A polite invitation will always receive more welcomes than rejections.
Malulah Kadir when he sits on the ministry overseeing culture and arts yet he doesn't know the basic culture and the art of speaking.
Guess, it is about time we have a new minister.
Among those expected to attend are Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Jamalullail, and Raja Permaisuri Agong, Tuanku Fauziah Tengku Abdul Rashid; Sultan Johor, Sultan Iskandar dan Sultanah Johor, Sultanah Zanariah; Tengku Mahkota Johor, Tengku Ibrahim Ismail and Raja Zarith Sofia.
Also expected are Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi; Prime Minister of Singapore, Goh Chok Thong and his deputy, Lee Hsein Loong. Their cabinet ministers are expected to attend the function as well.
In his eagerness to invite the public to attend the function, Minister of Culture, Arts & Tourism, Datuk Paduka Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir said, "I know the Chinese does not normally go out on the third day of Chinese New Year, tapi malulah kalau orang Cina tidak datang". He was caught saying that on TV3.
One just could not understand why he has to put it in such a way to invite the public, especial the Chinese, to attend the open house. Why not make a proper, polite and sincere invitation. A polite invitation will always receive more welcomes than rejections.
Malulah Kadir when he sits on the ministry overseeing culture and arts yet he doesn't know the basic culture and the art of speaking.
Guess, it is about time we have a new minister.
Saturday, January 17, 2004
The Reluctant Commitment From Musa
Chief Minister finally, reluctantly, said that Sabah will implement open tender system for government contracts except for small and urgent projects.
“We will implement open tenders wherever necessary but those that involve small and urgent projects will be decided through the normal process,” he added.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had said that the majority of government contracts would be decided through open tender in line with on-going efforts to increase transparency, lower the cost of doing business and reduce the possibility of corruption.
People in Sabah have been waiting for a long time for Musa to make his commitment on the award of government projects. Too many hanky panky things have been going on in Sabah. Too many sharks, worse than loan sharks are taking advantage of the direct negotiated projects.
Qualified, experienced, capable and financially sound contractors, who could easily perform better, faster and with lower costs, were always the casualties of direct negotiated projects. Instead unknown companies, normally with political backing companies were given the projects.
These companies, of course, sold the projects for a quick profit. Some even openly scout for buyer when they were offered the LI (Letter of Intent). Another Ali Baba in the making. The work carried out later were of low standard due to too much commissions been paid out. And the Sabah government has everything to be blamed.
Direct negotiation in awarding of contracts have openly and intentionally created opportunities for favouritism and corruption. The PM was right in stopping the system previously practiced.
Look at Sabah, the one suffering are the people of the state. Not even a single government investment arms or agencies are properly managed and making profit. A good businessman will not continue with the business if it is not making money, unless, of course, he is losing money for his personal gains.
Being a businessman, Musa has already built up an unhealthy image among the politicians, UMNO mostly, and the business world. He has been accused of buying his votes even for the party's divisional election. He is more of a businessman than a politician. His political calculations have more considerations on business than the actual needs of the people.
If Musa is not reluctant on direct negotiation, then be open, tell the people how he catogorises 'small and urgent projects'. Let the people know and let the people judge. Don't fool the people, elected representatives are not necessary the best or the most intelligent.
Is the water privatisation project small and urgent? Any review?
“We will implement open tenders wherever necessary but those that involve small and urgent projects will be decided through the normal process,” he added.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had said that the majority of government contracts would be decided through open tender in line with on-going efforts to increase transparency, lower the cost of doing business and reduce the possibility of corruption.
People in Sabah have been waiting for a long time for Musa to make his commitment on the award of government projects. Too many hanky panky things have been going on in Sabah. Too many sharks, worse than loan sharks are taking advantage of the direct negotiated projects.
Qualified, experienced, capable and financially sound contractors, who could easily perform better, faster and with lower costs, were always the casualties of direct negotiated projects. Instead unknown companies, normally with political backing companies were given the projects.
These companies, of course, sold the projects for a quick profit. Some even openly scout for buyer when they were offered the LI (Letter of Intent). Another Ali Baba in the making. The work carried out later were of low standard due to too much commissions been paid out. And the Sabah government has everything to be blamed.
Direct negotiation in awarding of contracts have openly and intentionally created opportunities for favouritism and corruption. The PM was right in stopping the system previously practiced.
Look at Sabah, the one suffering are the people of the state. Not even a single government investment arms or agencies are properly managed and making profit. A good businessman will not continue with the business if it is not making money, unless, of course, he is losing money for his personal gains.
Being a businessman, Musa has already built up an unhealthy image among the politicians, UMNO mostly, and the business world. He has been accused of buying his votes even for the party's divisional election. He is more of a businessman than a politician. His political calculations have more considerations on business than the actual needs of the people.
If Musa is not reluctant on direct negotiation, then be open, tell the people how he catogorises 'small and urgent projects'. Let the people know and let the people judge. Don't fool the people, elected representatives are not necessary the best or the most intelligent.
Is the water privatisation project small and urgent? Any review?
Friday, January 16, 2004
Angel & Devil
Man (woman alike) has many faces. Most people would have the angel and the devil faces, at different time, different place. Some manage to control so as when to show an angel face and when to show the opposite. Some just lost control and let other decide what face or rather the true colour to show.
Aspiring candidates for the coming election are showing up their angel faces as much as they could. They smile more and sweeter. They wave with their hands higher up in the air. They bow lower.
Once they are elected, the walk straight with nose higher up, skeptical looks, cold hand shake and unapproachable. That's the devil face that they are showing. When they have manipulated the people whom they deceived in voting for them, they avoid them untill the next election.
The daring ones change rapidly. During the day they pretend to champion the rights and solving the problems of the the people. During the night they are found partying away in pubs, discos and karaokes. Some even have their own entertainment outlets through their proxies. By using their same sets of bodyguards during the day time, they turn them into bouncers at night.
During the day they foster good relationships with the the local authorities, assuming for fast people's problem solving. At night they "improve" these relationships for not taking actions on their premises and the illegal activities that they carry out.
That explains why certain premises are never 'disturbed' by the authorities and certain areas never have electricity disruption even the whole town is in the dark.
So watch out for angels and devils. Which is better, a known devil or an unknown angel.
Aspiring candidates for the coming election are showing up their angel faces as much as they could. They smile more and sweeter. They wave with their hands higher up in the air. They bow lower.
Once they are elected, the walk straight with nose higher up, skeptical looks, cold hand shake and unapproachable. That's the devil face that they are showing. When they have manipulated the people whom they deceived in voting for them, they avoid them untill the next election.
The daring ones change rapidly. During the day they pretend to champion the rights and solving the problems of the the people. During the night they are found partying away in pubs, discos and karaokes. Some even have their own entertainment outlets through their proxies. By using their same sets of bodyguards during the day time, they turn them into bouncers at night.
During the day they foster good relationships with the the local authorities, assuming for fast people's problem solving. At night they "improve" these relationships for not taking actions on their premises and the illegal activities that they carry out.
That explains why certain premises are never 'disturbed' by the authorities and certain areas never have electricity disruption even the whole town is in the dark.
So watch out for angels and devils. Which is better, a known devil or an unknown angel.
Thursday, January 15, 2004
JKR - Jabatan Kacau Rakyat?
There are non-stop complaints from people through out the state on bad roads. Photographs were taken and the people's representatives, PKRs, YBs, were brought there to see for themselves. They made press statements and promised to look into the matter. Months and years passed by, the people renew their complaints. The YBs, too, renewed their promises, but nothing fullfilled.
Why? Ask JKR.
During every year end there are resurfacing works for roads proposed and supervised by JKR. The BIG problem is, JKR only resurface roads which they think should resurface, irrespective whether the road is good or bad. Most of the time their judgement is far from that of a little kid.
Almost 90% of the roads resurfaced this year are roads in good condition which could easily last for another 5 years. But these roads, mostly in the town areas, have been resurface years after years. Road users are cursing the contractors for purposedly creating traffic jams on almost brand new road while the poor kampung folks have been waiting and waiting for nothing for years.
This has been the norm year in year out. The public has grown fed up of this. The question in everyone's mind is, Do JKR really employed qualified engineers? Or are they really engineers? Could these so called 'high qualified' engineers differentiate what is good and what is not?
Pay a visit to the JKR office in Kota Kinabalu. All the rooms are either tinted or covered with papers. Are they having "direct negotiation", "private negotiation" or "closed door meeting"? Why hide? Be transparent and be brave to face the public. Explain why good roads are kept resurfaced but the bad one are left behind years after years?
What is JKR? Jabatan Kerja Raya or Jabatan Kacau Rakyat? Jangan Kerja Rajin? Jom Kasi Rosak? Jadi Kacau Rosak?
Why? Ask JKR.
During every year end there are resurfacing works for roads proposed and supervised by JKR. The BIG problem is, JKR only resurface roads which they think should resurface, irrespective whether the road is good or bad. Most of the time their judgement is far from that of a little kid.
Almost 90% of the roads resurfaced this year are roads in good condition which could easily last for another 5 years. But these roads, mostly in the town areas, have been resurface years after years. Road users are cursing the contractors for purposedly creating traffic jams on almost brand new road while the poor kampung folks have been waiting and waiting for nothing for years.
This has been the norm year in year out. The public has grown fed up of this. The question in everyone's mind is, Do JKR really employed qualified engineers? Or are they really engineers? Could these so called 'high qualified' engineers differentiate what is good and what is not?
Pay a visit to the JKR office in Kota Kinabalu. All the rooms are either tinted or covered with papers. Are they having "direct negotiation", "private negotiation" or "closed door meeting"? Why hide? Be transparent and be brave to face the public. Explain why good roads are kept resurfaced but the bad one are left behind years after years?
What is JKR? Jabatan Kerja Raya or Jabatan Kacau Rakyat? Jangan Kerja Rajin? Jom Kasi Rosak? Jadi Kacau Rosak?
Wednesday, January 14, 2004
Natives Claim Land Rights Violeted
Ten representatives from 119 villages alleged on 12-1-2004 that the State Government under various administrations had systematically violated their land rights under Native Customary Rights (NCR).
Stating this in a memorandum to the Chief Minister, they also alleged that the Government had ignored their applications for ownership over the land they have been living on for generations, and that the Lands and Surveys Department gave these away to agriculture-based companies.
Among the firms cited in their memorandum include Syarikat Asiatic Sdn Bhd, Hap Seng Consolidated Bhd, Corak Nahkoda Sdn Bhd and Borneo Semudera for oil palm plantations. However, they did not say under which Land and Surveys Department Director these “abnormalities” occurred.
The group, comprised of Wilster Lawrence of Kampung Minusoh, in Tongod, Kinabatangan, representatives from Keningau, Kg Karamuak and Kuamut of Kinabatangan, Kota Belud, Tuaran, Penampang, Kota Marudu and Kudat.
According to spokesman from the Partners of Community Organisation (Pacos Trust), Gallus Ahtoi, the group represented about 10,000 people. Pacos Trust is a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) helping the group to co-ordinate and prepare the memorandum.
Wilster claimed that the State Government had indiscriminately given away the land they should by right be owning under the NCR to these private companies. For example, he said there had been cases where villagers had resettled and applied for the land on which they stayed for more than 30 years, but this was not considered by the Lands and Surveys Department.
Furthermore, the Government later gazetted the land as a water catchment area, without bothering to consult the affected residents, he said.
They regretted that the Government’s action reflected complete disregard to their status and rights as indigenous people of the country.
He also voiced frustration over the non-chalant attitude of the Lands and Surveys Department “which has been entrusted by the Government to supervise the distribution of land to the landless people but had failed to safeguard the NCR rights”. The failure by the Department has resulted in the rights of the indigenous people of Sabah being violated, contrary to the provisions under the State Land Ordinance Chapter 68.
Also included in the memorandum were:
1. Urging the State Government to recognise their land rights under NCR;
2. Informing the people openly the procedure to recognise the NCR as mentioned in Section 14 of the State Land Ordinance Chapter 68;
3. Urging the Government to inform the people the criteria in owning NCR and hold dialogue with the indigenous people, and taking into account their local customs (adat); and
4. Encourage communal land titles as provided under Section 76 or Native Reserve under Section 78 of the Land Ordinance.
Meanwhile, the complainants from Tongod and Penangah said that the land for which they claimed as NCR had been approved by the Government to big companies.
They claimed they had been in the area for generations since the days of their “great-great grandfathers” but had been disregarded by the State Government.
Another complainant from Kudat claimed that the Government had deprived them of their rights through “empty promises”.
He claimed that in 1972, the Government promised to make them settlers at Kampung Radtak, Pinawatai, Pomonsukan, Sungai Pupu and Kabangaan once the Sabah Land Development Board (SLDB) had taken over and developed the land.
“The Government also promised that once we had become settlers for 25 years, the land will return to us,” he said. However, the promise was never fulfilled when SLDB handed over the land to Sawit Kinabalu.
Any comments from the YBs, who claim to champion the people's rights?
Stating this in a memorandum to the Chief Minister, they also alleged that the Government had ignored their applications for ownership over the land they have been living on for generations, and that the Lands and Surveys Department gave these away to agriculture-based companies.
Among the firms cited in their memorandum include Syarikat Asiatic Sdn Bhd, Hap Seng Consolidated Bhd, Corak Nahkoda Sdn Bhd and Borneo Semudera for oil palm plantations. However, they did not say under which Land and Surveys Department Director these “abnormalities” occurred.
The group, comprised of Wilster Lawrence of Kampung Minusoh, in Tongod, Kinabatangan, representatives from Keningau, Kg Karamuak and Kuamut of Kinabatangan, Kota Belud, Tuaran, Penampang, Kota Marudu and Kudat.
According to spokesman from the Partners of Community Organisation (Pacos Trust), Gallus Ahtoi, the group represented about 10,000 people. Pacos Trust is a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) helping the group to co-ordinate and prepare the memorandum.
Wilster claimed that the State Government had indiscriminately given away the land they should by right be owning under the NCR to these private companies. For example, he said there had been cases where villagers had resettled and applied for the land on which they stayed for more than 30 years, but this was not considered by the Lands and Surveys Department.
Furthermore, the Government later gazetted the land as a water catchment area, without bothering to consult the affected residents, he said.
They regretted that the Government’s action reflected complete disregard to their status and rights as indigenous people of the country.
He also voiced frustration over the non-chalant attitude of the Lands and Surveys Department “which has been entrusted by the Government to supervise the distribution of land to the landless people but had failed to safeguard the NCR rights”. The failure by the Department has resulted in the rights of the indigenous people of Sabah being violated, contrary to the provisions under the State Land Ordinance Chapter 68.
Also included in the memorandum were:
1. Urging the State Government to recognise their land rights under NCR;
2. Informing the people openly the procedure to recognise the NCR as mentioned in Section 14 of the State Land Ordinance Chapter 68;
3. Urging the Government to inform the people the criteria in owning NCR and hold dialogue with the indigenous people, and taking into account their local customs (adat); and
4. Encourage communal land titles as provided under Section 76 or Native Reserve under Section 78 of the Land Ordinance.
Meanwhile, the complainants from Tongod and Penangah said that the land for which they claimed as NCR had been approved by the Government to big companies.
They claimed they had been in the area for generations since the days of their “great-great grandfathers” but had been disregarded by the State Government.
Another complainant from Kudat claimed that the Government had deprived them of their rights through “empty promises”.
He claimed that in 1972, the Government promised to make them settlers at Kampung Radtak, Pinawatai, Pomonsukan, Sungai Pupu and Kabangaan once the Sabah Land Development Board (SLDB) had taken over and developed the land.
“The Government also promised that once we had become settlers for 25 years, the land will return to us,” he said. However, the promise was never fulfilled when SLDB handed over the land to Sawit Kinabalu.
Any comments from the YBs, who claim to champion the people's rights?
Monday, January 12, 2004
What Criterias, Musa?
Sabah Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Musa aman said the strength of a party will be the main criteria for seat distribution among Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties for the upcoming state and general elections.
Musa, who is also State BN Chief, added that other factors, including suitability of candidates, would also be taken into account to ensure BN's victory.
However he did not elaborate what are the other factors in details. Since what he wants is victory and suitability, why not let the people know what criterias and suitabilities he is looking for in a candidate. Make it public and let the public propose. He can then finalise the candidates.
Since Pak Lah has stopped all direct negotiated projects and preferred open tender, let the people a chance to propose their candidates as well.
Does he dare to try? Be open and be transparent?
Musa, who is also State BN Chief, added that other factors, including suitability of candidates, would also be taken into account to ensure BN's victory.
However he did not elaborate what are the other factors in details. Since what he wants is victory and suitability, why not let the people know what criterias and suitabilities he is looking for in a candidate. Make it public and let the public propose. He can then finalise the candidates.
Since Pak Lah has stopped all direct negotiated projects and preferred open tender, let the people a chance to propose their candidates as well.
Does he dare to try? Be open and be transparent?
Saturday, January 10, 2004
Rubbish For Rubbish
People in Tawau especially the Chinese community had another good laugh recently. There were just too many things happening in Tawau that appeared in the local dailies.
First the self-claim Chinese LDP leader, Liew Yun Fah, has been using the party president's name to force contractors and local leaders to help him clean up rubbish in Tawau. Contractors and Askar Wataniah 516 carried out the work while Liew got his reporters to take pictures and published in the papers. Liew of course claimed credits for all this.
For the record, Liew has gained some respect from the folks in the affected areas where rubbish is concern. However, the actual people doing the work were never mentioned, far from being praised or acknowledged.
Thinking that he has been accepted as the Tawau leader, Liew went on to force his way into a Tawau LDP election committee where he is now the advisor. The committee was made up of mostly seasoned politicians compared to Liew who is practically a new comer in politics.
Claiming as Tawau Chinese leader, Liew organised a dinner for the LDP President, Datuk Chong Kah Kiat, to be with the Chinese community. Beautiful invitation cards were sent out. However, he made a serious mistake. Liew got Chong's name wrongly spelt. He is now Chong Kah Kait instead of Chong Kah Kiat. News spreaded fast among coffee shop mongers, not only in Tawau but also other parts of the state.
It seems that LDP is only interested in Datuks to join the party. Ever since Henry Lee left the party due disatisfaction on ground of party president practising cronism, LDP went all out for Datuk search. First it found Datuk Kong Hon Meng, who was elected as the first LDP state assemblyman and later made a state minister. Kong however challenged Datuk Chong Kah Kiat but lost. Chong, won the battle but lost a lot of money to buy out votes, even from his own supporters. Kong left not long after.
LDP then found Datuk Peter Lim from Tawau to join the party a few years later. He was immediately made a supreme council members. Peter Lim gained respect and popularity among the party member fast. He received the fourth highest votes during the party election.
Fearing Peter Lim's fast move in the party, LDP scouted for another Lim. This time Datuk Elbert Lim. Elbert too make a big wave in the party and gained popularity fast. Elbert, however, toned down due to strong critism of illegal timber logging where he was alleged to be involved.
After the two Datuk Lims, LDP found Datuk Liew Yun Fah. With 3 heavy weight Datuks in Tawau, LDP must seriously fight for at least one seat during the coming election. Should the party fail to secure any seats in Tawau, the public would give the answer fast, without grass-root support, no party would survive.
First the self-claim Chinese LDP leader, Liew Yun Fah, has been using the party president's name to force contractors and local leaders to help him clean up rubbish in Tawau. Contractors and Askar Wataniah 516 carried out the work while Liew got his reporters to take pictures and published in the papers. Liew of course claimed credits for all this.
For the record, Liew has gained some respect from the folks in the affected areas where rubbish is concern. However, the actual people doing the work were never mentioned, far from being praised or acknowledged.
Thinking that he has been accepted as the Tawau leader, Liew went on to force his way into a Tawau LDP election committee where he is now the advisor. The committee was made up of mostly seasoned politicians compared to Liew who is practically a new comer in politics.
Claiming as Tawau Chinese leader, Liew organised a dinner for the LDP President, Datuk Chong Kah Kiat, to be with the Chinese community. Beautiful invitation cards were sent out. However, he made a serious mistake. Liew got Chong's name wrongly spelt. He is now Chong Kah Kait instead of Chong Kah Kiat. News spreaded fast among coffee shop mongers, not only in Tawau but also other parts of the state.
It seems that LDP is only interested in Datuks to join the party. Ever since Henry Lee left the party due disatisfaction on ground of party president practising cronism, LDP went all out for Datuk search. First it found Datuk Kong Hon Meng, who was elected as the first LDP state assemblyman and later made a state minister. Kong however challenged Datuk Chong Kah Kiat but lost. Chong, won the battle but lost a lot of money to buy out votes, even from his own supporters. Kong left not long after.
LDP then found Datuk Peter Lim from Tawau to join the party a few years later. He was immediately made a supreme council members. Peter Lim gained respect and popularity among the party member fast. He received the fourth highest votes during the party election.
Fearing Peter Lim's fast move in the party, LDP scouted for another Lim. This time Datuk Elbert Lim. Elbert too make a big wave in the party and gained popularity fast. Elbert, however, toned down due to strong critism of illegal timber logging where he was alleged to be involved.
After the two Datuk Lims, LDP found Datuk Liew Yun Fah. With 3 heavy weight Datuks in Tawau, LDP must seriously fight for at least one seat during the coming election. Should the party fail to secure any seats in Tawau, the public would give the answer fast, without grass-root support, no party would survive.
Friday, January 09, 2004
Pre-Election Bahaviours
There are always some weird, funny and sometimes childish behaviours of politicians before the general elections. These behaviours are rather similar to those of students before sitting for government examinations, or young gradutes facing interviews. Some politicians show their behaviour only to the people around them but some took it to the press.
Lahad Datu Assemblyman Samsu Baharun Abdul Rahman who is also the Assistant Industrial Development Minister, sacked his Lahad Datu People’s Development Leader (PKR), Aliandu Enjil, effective Jan 1(pic). He said Aliandu could no more assist him as he (Aliandu) does not show much interest.
Aliandu's dismissal however prompted Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Lajim Ukin's comment saying that Samsu has no right to sack a PKR since it is the sole prerogative of the Chief Minister. He also cautioned the timing of its sacking before the election as he fears of the negative impact on the voters, especially UMNO supporters.
Samsu, in retaliation, hit back and Lajim asking him not to meddle with Lahad Datu affairs. He said he knows better about his own constituency. Lajim should mind his own business and shut up. He even call Lajim an outsider.
How far this quarrel will go on is for us to see. The public certainly has a good laugh at it on how their leaders behave and what priorities are being emphasized, personal or public?
News coverage on politicians lately are similar to those gossips among the artists in the entertainment world. Artists make every effort to appear in the media to gain popularity. Politicians too, sometimes, go for cheap pulicity to gain attention.
The differece is the artists earned their popularity for their career. The YBs, some, misuse their career to trade for popularity. The voters' vote don't necessary based on popularity, but honesty and sincerity.
Lahad Datu Assemblyman Samsu Baharun Abdul Rahman who is also the Assistant Industrial Development Minister, sacked his Lahad Datu People’s Development Leader (PKR), Aliandu Enjil, effective Jan 1(pic). He said Aliandu could no more assist him as he (Aliandu) does not show much interest.
Aliandu's dismissal however prompted Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Lajim Ukin's comment saying that Samsu has no right to sack a PKR since it is the sole prerogative of the Chief Minister. He also cautioned the timing of its sacking before the election as he fears of the negative impact on the voters, especially UMNO supporters.
Samsu, in retaliation, hit back and Lajim asking him not to meddle with Lahad Datu affairs. He said he knows better about his own constituency. Lajim should mind his own business and shut up. He even call Lajim an outsider.
How far this quarrel will go on is for us to see. The public certainly has a good laugh at it on how their leaders behave and what priorities are being emphasized, personal or public?
News coverage on politicians lately are similar to those gossips among the artists in the entertainment world. Artists make every effort to appear in the media to gain popularity. Politicians too, sometimes, go for cheap pulicity to gain attention.
The differece is the artists earned their popularity for their career. The YBs, some, misuse their career to trade for popularity. The voters' vote don't necessary based on popularity, but honesty and sincerity.
Monday, January 05, 2004
Misleading Ads or Misleading Leader?
Culture, Arts and Tourism Minister Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir has repeatedly criticised no-frills airline AirAsia's attention-grabbing advertisements, which appear to be no different to those used by successful foreign budget airlines such as FlyBE, EasyJet, RyanAir and Virgin Blue.
Kadir's criticism has also prompted an investigation by the Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry.
Though there were complaints against Air Asia but it was never about misleading advertisements. Most people understand well what was advertised and what it meant. However the wise minister chose to be ignorant and attacked the airline on ground best known to himself.
Probably this is the time for another politician to show his true colour, as we have seen earlier after Najib and Nazri. People of Sabah knows who Kadir really is. He was one of the selected few who was in Sabah to fish for opportunists elected assemblymen to leave PBS. His efforts, together with his other colleagues, have brought the downfall of PBS when those political frogs left PBS to enable the BN government formed.
Kadir has helped, or rather gave opportunities to the ungrateful assemblymen to betray their people. Whether his move was noble or devil is left for the people of Sabah to judge. If the people don't tell, time will.
But Kadir is certainly good in betraying. He has betrayed Tengku Razaleigh during the UMNO Team A Team B fight and now betraying the airlines which has helped promoted tourism industry and national integration.
If the majority, who support the airlines, fly Airasia and do not complain, why is Kadir making such a fuss? It is clear that Kadir has a hidden agenda. He is against more people flying and improve tourism industry. He is against national integeration between Sabah, Sarawak and Penisular Malaysia.
If he wants luxury, enjoying RM100 nasi lemak and pretty air hostesses serving on board, go fly MAS or get his own private jet!
Kadir's criticism has also prompted an investigation by the Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry.
Though there were complaints against Air Asia but it was never about misleading advertisements. Most people understand well what was advertised and what it meant. However the wise minister chose to be ignorant and attacked the airline on ground best known to himself.
Probably this is the time for another politician to show his true colour, as we have seen earlier after Najib and Nazri. People of Sabah knows who Kadir really is. He was one of the selected few who was in Sabah to fish for opportunists elected assemblymen to leave PBS. His efforts, together with his other colleagues, have brought the downfall of PBS when those political frogs left PBS to enable the BN government formed.
Kadir has helped, or rather gave opportunities to the ungrateful assemblymen to betray their people. Whether his move was noble or devil is left for the people of Sabah to judge. If the people don't tell, time will.
But Kadir is certainly good in betraying. He has betrayed Tengku Razaleigh during the UMNO Team A Team B fight and now betraying the airlines which has helped promoted tourism industry and national integration.
If the majority, who support the airlines, fly Airasia and do not complain, why is Kadir making such a fuss? It is clear that Kadir has a hidden agenda. He is against more people flying and improve tourism industry. He is against national integeration between Sabah, Sarawak and Penisular Malaysia.
If he wants luxury, enjoying RM100 nasi lemak and pretty air hostesses serving on board, go fly MAS or get his own private jet!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)